|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 56 post(s) |
|

CCP RubberBAND
CCP Engineering Corp CCP Engineering Alliance
273

|
Posted - 2014.04.15 14:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
We've been dying to talk about these changes and can't wait for your feedback. Feel free to poke me on: Twitter |
|
|

CCP RubberBAND
CCP Engineering Corp CCP Engineering Alliance
273

|
Posted - 2014.04.15 14:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aerieth wrote:I am not seeing the market group icon screen shot and instead am only seeing a duplicate of the removal of Extra Materials screen shot?
Only me or issue?
Not just you, we are looking into this. Feel free to poke me on: Twitter |
|
|

CCP RubberBAND
CCP Engineering Corp CCP Engineering Alliance
273

|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kitty Bear wrote:CCP RubberBAND wrote:We've been dying to talk about these changes and can't wait for your feedback. Moving away from a fixed npc pricing structure like this appears to be a good thing. Actually on reflection, I see that it should drive players to re-distribute themselves and their possessions to less centralised locations. Ships could die, possessions could be lost, this is all good. on an un-related note .... Can the same thing be done to trading in general with regard to sales taxes and broker fees ?
A couple of the follow up blogs should elaborate on this, but yes, the idea is that there is a more dynamic spread of players invested in Industry which should lead to a more interesting and dynamic landscape.
Sales tax and broker fees are a completely separate system, not something within scope of these changes though certainly an interesting idea. Feel free to poke me on: Twitter |
|
|

CCP RubberBAND
CCP Engineering Corp CCP Engineering Alliance
279

|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Oh, and one more thing: I might have missed it but will the Gǣcongestion chargesGǥ count up per activity or in total? And/or will it be split by the actual installation? In other words, will my manufacturing be more expensive because I'm in a station that sees a lot of ME research? Or will my ME research become more expensive because I'm using a lab array that already holds a bajillion invention jobs (but if I pick lab #2, I won't have to pay that tax)? Or is it rather the case in both examples that my manufacturing is only made more expensive by other manufacturing and my ME by other ME jobs, both of them happening in the exact same installation that I'm using? GǪor should I wait for the fifth blog before asking? 
Should probably wait. To your previous post, the UI is going to reduce the number of clicks required to both install and preview/adjust a job to almost none. Our goal was driven by the idea that we want both batch and single blueprint job installation to be painless but fun. I don't want to spoil the next few blogs so I will leave it at that.
As to the cost scaling based on activity in a system, I will simply say that you should notice the impact on cost of working in a busy system, but the blog should go into all the detail you need. Feel free to poke me on: Twitter |
|
|
|
|